Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm vs Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph

SpecificationCartier Pasha de Cartier 35mmOmega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph
BrandCartierOmega
CollectionPashaSpeedmaster
ReferenceWSPA0012324.30.38.50.02.001
CategoryDressChronograph
Movement TypeAutomaticAutomatic
CaliberCartier 1847 MCOmega 3330
Power Reserve42h52h
Frequency28,800 vph28,800 vph
Case Diameter35.0mm38.0mm
Case Thickness9.4mm14.7mm
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
CrystalSapphireSapphire with anti-reflective coating
Water Resistance100m / 328ft100m / 328ft
Weight110g120g
MSRP$5,550$5,600
Market Price$4,800$3,800

In-Depth Comparison

The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm and the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Cartier and Omega are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Pasha reference was introduced in 2020, while this Speedmaster reference debuted in 2017. The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm beats the Cartier 1847 MC caliber offering a 42-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 25 jewels. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph is powered by the Omega 3330 with a 52-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 26 jewels. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph wins on power reserve with a 10-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm features a 35.0mm case at 9.4mm thick with a 42.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph comes in at 38.0mm and 14.7mm thick with 43.5mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 110g, the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm uses a Sapphire crystal paired with a Fixed, polished round bezel, while the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph features Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal with a Fixed, stainless steel with tachymeter bezel. On the wrist, the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm comes on a Stainless steel bracelet with SmartLink with Folding clasp, while the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph is fitted with Stainless steel bracelet featuring Folding clasp with pushers.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm is rated to 100m / 328ft and the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph to 100m / 328ft. Both watches share the same water resistance rating, making them equally suited for aquatic activities.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm lists for $5,550 compared to $5,600 for the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph. On the secondary market, the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm trades around $4,800 while the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph commands approximately $3,800.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm and the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For dress occasions and smaller wrists, the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 35mm is more versatile. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.