Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 vs Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph

In-Depth Comparison

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 and the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Chopard and Omega are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Mille Miglia reference was introduced in 2018, while this Speedmaster reference debuted in 2017. The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 beats the ETA A05.231 (Chopard modified) caliber offering a 42-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 25 jewels. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph is powered by the Omega 3330 with a 52-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 26 jewels. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph wins on power reserve with a 10-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 features a 42.0mm case at 14.0mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph comes in at 38.0mm and 14.7mm thick with 43.5mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. The Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 115g, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Fixed, polished bezel, while the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph features Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal with a Fixed, stainless steel with tachymeter bezel. On the wrist, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 comes on a Calfskin leather strap with perforation with Stainless steel folding clasp, while the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph is fitted with Stainless steel bracelet featuring Folding clasp with pushers.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 is rated to 100m / 328ft and the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph to 100m / 328ft. Both watches share the same water resistance rating, making them equally suited for aquatic activities.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 lists for $5,550 compared to $5,600 for the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph. On the secondary market, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 trades around $4,200 while the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph commands approximately $3,800.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 and the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For dress occasions and smaller wrists, the Omega Speedmaster 38 Co-Axial Chronograph is more versatile. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.