IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 vs IWC Aquatimer Chronograph
| Specification | IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 | IWC Aquatimer Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | IWC | IWC |
| Collection | Aquatimer | Aquatimer |
| Reference | IW329101 | IW329003 |
| Category | Dive | Dive |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | 80110 | 89365 |
| Power Reserve | 44h | 68h |
| Frequency | 28,800 vph | 28,800 vph |
| Case Diameter | 46.0mm | 44.0mm |
| Case Thickness | 16.5mm | 16.8mm |
| Case Material | Titanium | Stainless Steel |
| Crystal | Sapphire | Sapphire |
| Water Resistance | 2000m / 6562ft | 300m / 984ft |
| Weight | 125g | 170g |
| MSRP | $11,900 | $12,400 |
| Market Price | $8,500 | $8,800 |
In-Depth Comparison
The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 and the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.
Heritage And Brand Prestige
IWC and IWC is a brand that needs no introduction. Comparing two models from the same manufacturer comes down to purpose, design philosophy, and intended use case. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Aquatimer reference was introduced in 2014, while this Aquatimer reference debuted in 2014.
Movement And Mechanics
At the heart of the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 beats the 80110 caliber offering a 44-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 28 jewels. The IWC Aquatimer Chronograph is powered by the 89365 with a 68-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 35 jewels. The IWC Aquatimer Chronograph wins on power reserve with a 24-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.
Dimensions And Wearability
The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 features a 46.0mm case at 16.5mm thick with a 54.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Titanium. The IWC Aquatimer Chronograph comes in at 44.0mm and 16.8mm thick with 52.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. The IWC Aquatimer Chronograph wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 125g, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 is the lighter of the two.
Materials And Construction
The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 uses a Sapphire crystal paired with a Internal rotating, SafeDive system bezel, while the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph features Sapphire crystal with a Internal rotating, SafeDive system bezel. On the wrist, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 comes on a Black rubber strap with Folding clasp with diver extension, while the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph is fitted with Black rubber strap featuring Folding clasp with diver extension.
Water Resistance And Capability
The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 is rated to 2000m / 6562ft and the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph to 300m / 984ft. For serious diving or water activities, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 offers a meaningful advantage.
Pricing And Value
At retail, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 lists for $11,900 compared to $12,400 for the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph. On the secondary market, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 trades around $8,500 while the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph commands approximately $8,800.
The Verdict
Choosing between the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 and the IWC Aquatimer Chronograph ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For diving and water sports, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 is the stronger choice. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.