IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 vs Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M

SpecificationIWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M
BrandIWCOmega
CollectionAquatimerSeamaster
ReferenceIW329101215.30.46.21.01.001
CategoryDiveDive
Movement TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Caliber80110Omega 8912
Power Reserve44h60h
Frequency28,800 vph25,200 vph
Case Diameter46.0mm45.5mm
Case Thickness16.5mm18.1mm
Case MaterialTitaniumO-Megasteel
CrystalSapphireSapphire with anti-reflective coating
Water Resistance2000m / 6562ft6000m / 19685ft
Weight125g215g
MSRP$11,900$12,200
Market Price$8,500$10,500

In-Depth Comparison

The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 and the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

IWC and Omega are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Aquatimer reference was introduced in 2014, while this Seamaster reference debuted in 2022. The Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 beats the 80110 caliber offering a 44-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 28 jewels. The Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M is powered by the Omega 8912 with a 60-hour power reserve operating at 25,200 vph featuring 39 jewels. The Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M wins on power reserve with a 16-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 features a 46.0mm case at 16.5mm thick with a 54.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Titanium. The Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M comes in at 45.5mm and 18.1mm thick with 52.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from O-Megasteel. Both watches are virtually identical in diameter, so wrist presence will be comparable. At 125g, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 uses a Sapphire crystal paired with a Internal rotating, SafeDive system bezel, while the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M features Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal with a Unidirectional rotating, black ceramic with Liquidmetal diving scale bezel. On the wrist, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 comes on a Black rubber strap with Folding clasp with diver extension, while the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M is fitted with O-Megasteel bracelet featuring Adjustable folding clasp with diver extension.

Water Resistance And Capability

The IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 is rated to 2000m / 6562ft and the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M to 6000m / 19685ft. For water sports and diving, the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 lists for $11,900 compared to $12,200 for the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M. On the secondary market, the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 trades around $8,500 while the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M commands approximately $10,500.

The Verdict

Choosing between the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000 and the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For diving and water sports, the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep 6000M is the stronger choice. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.