Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 vs Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001

In-Depth Comparison

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 and the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Chopard and Omega are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular L.U.C reference was introduced in 2017, while this Speedmaster reference debuted in 2016. The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 beats the Chopard L.U.C 01.10-L caliber offering a 60-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 32 jewels. The Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 is powered by the Omega 9904 with a 60-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 44 jewels. Both watches offer identical power reserves, making them equally practical for daily rotation.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 features a 42.0mm case at 11.5mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 comes in at 44.2mm and 17.0mm thick with 51.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 90g, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Fixed, polished bezel, while the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed tachymeter bezel. On the wrist, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 comes on a Black alligator leather strap with Stainless steel folding clasp, while the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 is fitted with Leather strap featuring Deployant buckle.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is rated to 50m / 164ft and the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 to 100m / 328ft. For water sports and diving, the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 lists for $11,600 compared to $11,600 for the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001. On the secondary market, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 trades around $8,500 while the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 commands approximately $10,000.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 and the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.03.001 ultimately comes down to personal priorities. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.