Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 vs Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001

In-Depth Comparison

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 and the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Chopard and Chopard is a brand that needs no introduction. Comparing two models from the same manufacturer comes down to purpose, design philosophy, and intended use case. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular L.U.C reference was introduced in 2017, while this L.U.C reference debuted in 2015. The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 beats the Chopard L.U.C 01.10-L caliber offering a 60-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 32 jewels. The Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 is powered by the Chopard L.U.C 96.13-L with a 65-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 35 jewels. The Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 wins on power reserve with a 5-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 features a 42.0mm case at 11.5mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 comes in at 43.0mm and 12.2mm thick with 50.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from 18k Rose Gold. The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 90g, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Fixed, polished bezel, while the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 features Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal with a Fixed, polished bezel. On the wrist, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 comes on a Black alligator leather strap with Stainless steel folding clasp, while the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 is fitted with Brown alligator leather strap featuring 18k rose gold folding clasp.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is rated to 50m / 164ft and the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 to 30m / 98ft. For serious diving or water activities, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 offers a meaningful advantage.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 lists for $11,600 compared to $62,800 for the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001. The Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 is the more accessible option at MSRP, saving $51,200 at retail. On the secondary market, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 trades around $8,500 while the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 commands approximately $48,000.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 and the Chopard L.U.C Perpetual Calendar 168523-3001 ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For value-conscious buyers, the Chopard L.U.C GMT One 168579-3001 delivers excellent quality at a lower price point. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.