Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 vs Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue

In-Depth Comparison

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 and the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Chopard and Chopard is a brand that needs no introduction. Comparing two models from the same manufacturer comes down to purpose, design philosophy, and intended use case. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Mille Miglia reference was introduced in 2018, while this Mille Miglia reference debuted in 2023. The Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 beats the ETA A05.231 (Chopard modified) caliber offering a 42-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 25 jewels. The Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue is powered by the Chopard 03.05-C with a 48-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 25 jewels. The Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue wins on power reserve with a 6-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 features a 42.0mm case at 14.0mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue comes in at 44.0mm and 15.0mm thick with 51.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 115g, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Fixed, polished bezel, while the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed Tachymeter bezel. On the wrist, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 comes on a Calfskin leather strap with perforation with Stainless steel folding clasp, while the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue is fitted with Rubber strap featuring Buckle.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 is rated to 100m / 328ft and the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue to 100m / 328ft. Both watches share the same water resistance rating, making them equally suited for aquatic activities.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 lists for $5,550 compared to $7,290 for the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue. The Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 is the more accessible option at MSRP, saving $1,740 at retail. On the secondary market, the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 trades around $4,200 while the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue commands approximately $6,000.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Chopard Mille Miglia Classic Chronograph 168589-3001 and the Chopard Mille Miglia GTS Chrono Blue ultimately comes down to personal priorities. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.