Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC vs Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A

In-Depth Comparison

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC and the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Audemars Piguet and Patek Philippe are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Code 11.59 reference was introduced in 2019, while this Nautilus reference debuted in 2014. The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC beats the Audemars Piguet 4401 caliber offering a 70-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 40 jewels. The Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A is powered by the Patek Philippe CH 28-520 C FUS with a 55-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 40 jewels. The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC wins on power reserve with a 15-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC features a 41.0mm case at 12.5mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in 18K White Gold. The Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A comes in at 40.5mm and 12.0mm thick with 48.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. Both watches are virtually identical in diameter, so wrist presence will be comparable. At 108g, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC uses a Sapphire crystal paired with a Fixed polished bezel, while the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed polished bezel. On the wrist, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC comes on a Leather strap with alligator with AP fold-over clasp, while the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A is fitted with Stainless steel bracelet featuring Fold-over clasp.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is rated to 30m / 98ft and the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A to 120m / 394ft. For water sports and diving, the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC lists for $42,500 compared to $58,120 for the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A. The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is the more accessible option at MSRP, saving $15,620 at retail. On the secondary market, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC trades around $38,000 while the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A commands approximately $110,000. The Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A carries a 89% market premium.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC and the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For value-conscious buyers, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC delivers excellent quality at a lower price point. as an investment, the Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph 5990/1A shows strong value retention. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.