Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508

In-Depth Comparison

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Audemars Piguet and Rolex are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Code 11.59 reference was introduced in 2019, while this Daytona reference debuted in 2016. The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC beats the Audemars Piguet 4401 caliber offering a 70-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 40 jewels. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 is powered by the Rolex 4130 with a 72-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 44 jewels. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 wins on power reserve with a 2-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC features a 41.0mm case at 12.5mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in 18K White Gold. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 comes in at 40.0mm and 12.2mm thick with 47.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from 18K Yellow Gold. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 108g, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC uses a Sapphire crystal paired with a Fixed polished bezel, while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed polished bezel. On the wrist, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC comes on a Leather strap with alligator with AP fold-over clasp, while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 is fitted with Oyster bracelet featuring Oysterlock clasp with Easylink.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC is rated to 30m / 98ft and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 to 100m / 328ft. For water sports and diving, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC lists for $42,500 compared to $38,100 for the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 is the more accessible option at MSRP, saving $4,400 at retail. On the secondary market, the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC trades around $38,000 while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 commands approximately $70,000. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 carries a 84% market premium.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 Chronograph 26393BC and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For value-conscious buyers, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 delivers excellent quality at a lower price point. for dress occasions and smaller wrists, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 is more versatile. as an investment, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Green Dial 116508 shows strong value retention. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.