Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 vs Tudor Royal 38

SpecificationBreitling Chronomat Automatic 40Tudor Royal 38
BrandBreitlingTudor
CollectionChronomatRoyal
ReferenceA37340351B1A1M28500-0005
CategorySportsSports
Movement TypeAutomaticAutomatic
CaliberBreitling 17T601
Power Reserve38h38h
Frequency28,800 vph28,800 vph
Case Diameter40.0mm38.0mm
Case Thickness11.2mm10.5mm
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
CrystalSapphire with anti-reflective coatingSapphire
Water Resistance200m / 656ft100m / 328ft
Weight155g135g
MSRP$4,850$2,350
Market Price$3,400$1,600

In-Depth Comparison

The Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 and the Tudor Royal 38 represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Breitling and Tudor are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Chronomat reference was introduced in 2021, while this Royal reference debuted in 2020. The Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 beats the Breitling 17 caliber offering a 38-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 25 jewels. The Tudor Royal 38 is powered by the T601 with a 38-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 25 jewels. Both watches offer identical power reserves, making them equally practical for daily rotation.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 features a 40.0mm case at 11.2mm thick with a 46.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Tudor Royal 38 comes in at 38.0mm and 10.5mm thick with 44.5mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. The Tudor Royal 38 wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 135g, the Tudor Royal 38 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Unidirectional rotating, rider tabs bezel, while the Tudor Royal 38 features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed, knurled steel bezel. On the wrist, the Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 comes on a Stainless steel Rouleaux bracelet with Folding clasp with micro-adjust, while the Tudor Royal 38 is fitted with Stainless steel integrated bracelet featuring Folding clasp with safety lock.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 is rated to 200m / 656ft and the Tudor Royal 38 to 100m / 328ft. For serious diving or water activities, the Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 offers a meaningful advantage.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 lists for $4,850 compared to $2,350 for the Tudor Royal 38. The Tudor Royal 38 is the more accessible option at MSRP, saving $2,500 at retail. On the secondary market, the Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 trades around $3,400 while the Tudor Royal 38 commands approximately $1,600.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Breitling Chronomat Automatic 40 and the Tudor Royal 38 ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For value-conscious buyers, the Tudor Royal 38 delivers excellent quality at a lower price point. for dress occasions and smaller wrists, the Tudor Royal 38 is more versatile. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.