Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 vs Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627

SpecificationChopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627
BrandChopardRolex
CollectionL.U.CYacht-Master
Reference168574-3001226627
CategoryGMTSports
Movement TypeAutomaticAutomatic
CaliberChopard L.U.C 01.05-LRolex 3235
Power Reserve60h70h
Frequency28,800 vph28,800 vph
Case Diameter42.0mm42.0mm
Case Thickness11.8mm12.1mm
Case MaterialStainless SteelRLX Titanium
CrystalSapphire with anti-reflective coatingSapphire
Water Resistance50m / 164ft100m / 328ft
Weight95g112g
MSRP$12,700$12,650
Market Price$9,500$16,000

In-Depth Comparison

The Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 and the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Chopard and Rolex are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular L.U.C reference was introduced in 2018, while this Yacht-Master reference debuted in 2023. The Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 beats the Chopard L.U.C 01.05-L caliber offering a 60-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 34 jewels. The Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 is powered by the Rolex 3235 with a 70-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 31 jewels. The Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 wins on power reserve with a 10-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 features a 42.0mm case at 11.8mm thick with a 49.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 comes in at 42.0mm and 12.1mm thick with 49.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from RLX Titanium. Both watches are virtually identical in diameter, so wrist presence will be comparable. At 95g, the Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Bidirectional rotating city bezel bezel, while the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 features Sapphire crystal with a Bidirectional rotating Cerachrom Black bezel. On the wrist, the Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 comes on a Black alligator leather strap with Stainless steel folding clasp, while the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 is fitted with Oysterflex bracelet featuring Oysterlock clasp.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 is rated to 50m / 164ft and the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 to 100m / 328ft. For water sports and diving, the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 lists for $12,700 compared to $12,650 for the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627. On the secondary market, the Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 trades around $9,500 while the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 commands approximately $16,000. The Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 carries a 26% market premium.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Chopard L.U.C Time Traveler One 168574-3001 and the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 ultimately comes down to personal priorities. As an investment, the Rolex Yacht-Master 42 RLX Titanium 226627 shows strong value retention. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.