Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute vs Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph

SpecificationBreitling Navitimer CosmonauteCartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph
BrandBreitlingCartier
CollectionNavitimerPasha
ReferenceB12019171B1P1WSPA0018
CategoryChronographChronograph
Movement TypeManualAutomatic
CaliberBreitling B12Cartier 8147 MC
Power Reserve70h42h
Frequency28,800 vph28,800 vph
Case Diameter41.0mm41.0mm
Case Thickness13.6mm13.1mm
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
CrystalSapphire with anti-reflective coatingSapphire
Water Resistance30m / 98ft100m / 328ft
Weight85g118g
MSRP$8,950$12,100
Market Price$7,500$10,000

In-Depth Comparison

The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute and the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

Breitling and Cartier are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Navitimer reference was introduced in 2022, while this Pasha reference debuted in 2020. The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute beats the Breitling B12 caliber offering a 70-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 46 jewels. The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph is powered by the Cartier 8147 MC with a 42-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 33 jewels. The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute wins on power reserve with a 28-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute features a 41.0mm case at 13.6mm thick with a 48.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph comes in at 41.0mm and 13.1mm thick with 48.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Stainless Steel. Both watches are virtually identical in diameter, so wrist presence will be comparable. At 85g, the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Bidirectional rotating, slide rule bezel, while the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed, polished round bezel. On the wrist, the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute comes on a Brown alligator leather strap with Folding clasp, while the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph is fitted with Black alligator leather strap with QuickSwitch featuring Steel deployant buckle.

Water Resistance And Capability

The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute is rated to 30m / 98ft and the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph to 100m / 328ft. For water sports and diving, the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute lists for $8,950 compared to $12,100 for the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph. The Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute is the more accessible option at MSRP, saving $3,150 at retail. On the secondary market, the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute trades around $7,500 while the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph commands approximately $10,000.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute and the Cartier Pasha de Cartier 41mm Chronograph ultimately comes down to personal priorities. For value-conscious buyers, the Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute delivers excellent quality at a lower price point. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.