TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 vs Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono

SpecificationTAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono
BrandTAG HeuerTudor
CollectionAutaviaPelagos
ReferenceCBE511A.BA0687M25807KN-0001
CategoryChronographChronograph
Movement TypeAutomaticAutomatic
CaliberHeuer 02 COSC FlybackMT5813
Power Reserve80h70h
Frequency28,800 vph28,800 vph
Case Diameter42.0mm43.0mm
Case Thickness16.0mm15.1mm
Case MaterialStainless SteelTitanium
CrystalSapphire with anti-reflective coatingSapphire
Water Resistance100m / 328ft200m / 656ft
Weight180g110g
MSRP$6,450$5,900
Market Price$4,800$5,500

In-Depth Comparison

The TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 and the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono represent two compelling options in the luxury watch market. Both timepieces have earned devoted followings among collectors and enthusiasts, but they approach horology from distinctly different perspectives. Let's break down how these two watches compare across the key dimensions that matter most to buyers.

Heritage And Brand Prestige

TAG Heuer and Tudor are both highly respected names in watchmaking. Both watches hail from Switzerland, benefiting from the region's deep horological tradition. This particular Autavia reference was introduced in 2019, while this Pelagos reference debuted in 2023. The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono is the newer release, potentially featuring more modern technology and finishing.

Movement And Mechanics

At the heart of the TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 beats the Heuer 02 COSC Flyback caliber offering a 80-hour power reserve running at 28,800 vph with 33 jewels. The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono is powered by the MT5813 with a 70-hour power reserve operating at 28,800 vph featuring 33 jewels. The TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 wins on power reserve with a 10-hour advantage, which means less frequent winding for those who rotate watches.

Dimensions And Wearability

The TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 features a 42.0mm case at 16.0mm thick with a 50.0mm lug-to-lug measurement, crafted in Stainless Steel. The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono comes in at 43.0mm and 15.1mm thick with 51.0mm lug-to-lug, constructed from Titanium. The TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 wears more compactly on the wrist, making it potentially more suitable for smaller wrists or those who prefer understated proportions. At 110g, the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono is the lighter of the two.

Materials And Construction

The TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 uses a Sapphire with anti-reflective coating crystal paired with a Bidirectional rotating, 12-hour ceramic insert bezel, while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono features Sapphire crystal with a Fixed, 60-minute graduated ceramic bezel. On the wrist, the TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 comes on a Stainless steel bracelet with Folding clasp with double safety push-buttons, while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono is fitted with Black fabric strap with titanium buckle featuring Pin buckle.

Water Resistance And Capability

The TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 is rated to 100m / 328ft and the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono to 200m / 656ft. For water sports and diving, the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono provides superior depth capability.

Pricing And Value

At retail, the TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 lists for $6,450 compared to $5,900 for the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono. On the secondary market, the TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 trades around $4,800 while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono commands approximately $5,500.

The Verdict

Choosing between the TAG Heuer Autavia Flyback Chronograph CBE511A.BA0687 and the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono ultimately comes down to personal priorities. Both watches are exceptional timepieces that will serve their owner well for generations. We recommend trying both on the wrist at an authorized dealer before making your final decision, as comfort and emotional connection are ultimately just as important as specifications.